BINLOOKIN

Here It Is!
 

GO BACK

 
LOOKING FOR ROMANCE?
 

GO BACK

 

Main Page
Contents
Index
About Binlookin
Contact Us
Links

 
 

Land For Sale
Real Estate
Russell Island Information
Macleay Island


Shopping

Fly Fishing
Dog Collars

Interesting Topics
Trout Fishing NZ
Fly Fishing Glossary Index

Interesting Sites
Fly Fishing
Vital-Visions
Feet Treat
Positive Dictionary
The Manor Minder
Wealth Education

 
SITE LINKS
Feet Treat

Fly Fishing
Fly Fishing Glossary Index
LCD Screens - Cleaning
Line Dancing
Manor Minder
Positive Dictionary
Trout Fishing
Vital-Visions
Wealth Education
 
 
 
 

GO BACK

 
  ROMANCE NOVELS   LOOKING FOR ROMANCE NOVELS
 
Point 1: Romances are all the same. This view is reinforced by the sympathetic academics, who try to identify commonalities across the genre of romance. Their analytic approach obscures the fact that many different types of romance novels are written, and that they appeal to varied audiences. Most studies of romance novels utilize only a handful of novels. Most importantly, they don't compare and contrast different types of romance novels.

Point 2: Romances are produced by publishers who demand conformity to a set formula, not by authors exercising full creativity. Academics and critics who don't read romances think categories are "romance novels." Every academic I have talked to believes that Danielle Steel writes romance novels (I make it a point to enlighten them); only one had ever heard of Nora Roberts. Frankly, there is some truth to the belief that publishers tend to enforce conformity to a formula in many cases. (What requires more examination is whether romance novelists are under more pressure to conform to a formula than are authors in other genres.)

Point 3: Romances promote a conservative message about male-female relationships. The concern here is that romance novels encourage women, particularly young and impressionable women, toward views that reinforce gender inequality. The concern is not that readers mix up reality and fantasy. Rather it is the belief that readers are subconsciously attracted to a latent message in the books that subverts feminism.

Point 4: Romances are borderline pornography. Unless they read a lot of popular fiction, academics are unaware how much variability there is in sexual explicitness. But I understand part of their point here. Romance novels contain much more explicit sex than mainstream fiction and other fiction genres. Several sympathetic academics have mentioned how uncomfortable they are with the objectification of both male and female bodies found in these books, and not just on the covers. The portrayal of Native American heroes in Westerns is the most troublesome example.

 
   
   
Custom Search
 
 
   
 
 
 
Disclaimer
 
 
Romance Topics
 
   
   
   
     
     

GO BACK

This site is growing and so will we, come along, look listen learn
Knowledge
Copyright 2010